Public Health Experts:
Our Best & Brightest? 

Is anyone here thinking that  our public health officials have "saved the day"?  Are they saviors, or bunglers?

The medical profession not only has an unusual amount of power and influence over our lives, but they are accorded god-like status no matter how they fumble.

Part of falling down the rabbit hole involves looking squarely at the conflicts of interest and the lies told by those in our regulatory agencies.

Local hospitals and clinics are full of good people, but they are mostly relying on career bureaucrats in the health field.  Some of those bureaucrats, like Dr. Anthony Fauci, have probably not seen a patient in decades, if ever.


Childhood vaccine schedule US


Chief Scientist at W.H.O. (the World Health Organization):



Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Chief Scientist at the W.H.O., addresses the world in a promotional video where she assures the public of the existence of robust vaccine safety systems and the overall SAFETY of vaccines. 

Here is that video, plus her true, and very different, opinion FIVE DAYS LATER behind closed doors at the Global Vaccine Safety Summit on Dec. 3rd, 2019.

3 minutes.


The GENIUSES approving vaccines for the childhood & adult schedules

The sound on this short video will begin at about 26 seconds, after a written introduction explaining the ACIP meeting.  "ACIP" is the acronym for "Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices":

Some decent questions asked - but terrible answers!

"I'm a little concerned about that myocardial infarction signal (heart attack signal)..." says one committee attendee.  Then he proceeds to vote for the new vaccine anyway.  After all, other "experts" will be watching for damage reports over the next two years - that is, if doctors and patients know to even report them!

The reporting system:

Electronic Support for Public Health -
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS) (Massachusetts)

"Summary:

"Adverse events from vaccines are common but underreported, with less than one percent reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Low reporting rates preclude or delay the identification of "problem" vaccines, potentially endangering the health of the public. New surveillance methods for drug and vaccine adverse effects are needed. Proactive, spontaneous, automated adverse event reporting embedded within electronic medical records (EMRs) and other information systems has the potential to speed the identification of problems with new vaccines and yield more careful quantification of the risks of older ones."

"Adverse events from vaccines are common but underreported, with less than one percent reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)." 

"Preliminary data were collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients. A total of 1.4 million vaccine doses (of 45 different vaccines) were given to 376,452 individuals. Of these doses, 35,570 possible reactions (2.6 percent of vaccinations) were identified. This is an average of 1.3 events per clinician per month. The team concluded that it is possible to automatically detect adverse events in defined ways, and to electronically report them to VAERS." 

Unfortunately, when HHS heard the adverse event rate, they stopped answering the phone.  End of study!

Read the full report by accessing the PDF on this page:

https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system





Nobel Laureate, PCR Inventor Said Fauci Was a Liar, Abusing Test Data For An Agenda

The Nobel Laureate inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, died at the age of 74 back in August of 2019 but prior to his death, he had a lot of interaction with Fauci.

He’d already gone to war with Fauci for misusing his PCR test.  Mullis and other scientists said Fauci was magnifying the retrovirus HIV using PCR to “prove” it was the cause of AIDS.  Mullis was furious that Fauci refused to debate him on science but argued from authority...

David Knight comments,  “Fauci didn’t want to have the debate because he only argues from AUTHORITY.  Mullis didn’t believe that there was a connection between HIV and AIDS and said they’re making this connection by misusing his test.  He said we all have retroviruses and they’re, literally, blowing this way out of proportion.  They’re amplifying it a TRILLION times, that’s what a PCR cycle of 40 does.”  The FDA requires PCR testing of COVID to be 40 CT (cycle threshold). Full article





W.H.O. Changes the Definition of "Herd Immunity"

by Jeffrey Tucker at AIER.org, 

Before: 

"Herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection."

After: 

‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached.

Screenshots, before & after:


"I cannot say why, exactly, the WHO did this. Given the events of the past nine or ten months, however, it is reasonable to assume that politics are at play. Since the beginning of the pandemic, those who have been pushing lockdowns and hysteria over the coronavirus have resisted the idea of natural herd immunity, instead insisting that we must live in lockdown until a vaccine is developed."

"That is why The Great Barrington Declaration, written by three of the world’s preeminent epidemiologists and which advocated embracing the phenomenon of herd immunity as a way of protecting the vulnerable and minimizing harms to society, was met with such venom.

"Now we see the WHO, too, succumbing to political pressure. This is the only rational explanation for changing the definition of herd immunity that has existed for the past century. 

"The science has not changed; only the politics have."  Full article

Update January 21, 2021:

WHO has returned to their earlier definition of "herd immunity", which includes both natural acquired immunity through infection, and vaccination.




CAUGHT ON CAMERA: WHO scientists question safety of vaccines

The bombshell video footage, published by Del Bigtree’s "The HighWire", captures a series of statements—profoundly unsettling in their matter-of-factness—made by professionals who, in early December, attended the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) two-day Global Vaccine Safety Summit on December 2 & 3 2019.

Also read CHD’s accompanying article Look WHO’s Talking! Vaccine Scientists Confirm Major Safety Problems

An excerpt from the transcript:  

08:05 Larson: The other thing that’s a trend and an issue is not just confidence in providers, but confidence OF healthcare providers. We have a very wobbly health professional frontline that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines.

When the frontline professionals are starting to question or they don’t feel like they have enough confidence about the safety to stand up to it, to the person asking them the questions. I mean, most medical school curriculums, even nursing curriculums, in medical school YOU'RE LUCKY IF YOU HAVE A HALF DAY ON VACCINES, never mind keeping up-to-date with all this.

You can read the rest of the transcript of this video at ChildrensHealthDefense.org.


J.P. Sears actually has the inside scoop on Public Health

JP actually has the public health system pretty well figured out.  

JP shows us how the Social Distancing Guidelines were REALLY created.

Recent Articles

  1. Vaccine Injury - What is it and How Do You Report It?

    Jun 08, 21 03:23 AM

    Vaccine injury - many doctors think it doesn't happen. They now consider seizures almost a rite of passage - but years ago they were rare, not common.

    Read More

  2. COVID-19 Perspectives from Around the World

    Jun 07, 21 11:10 PM

    COVID-19 perspectives from countries around the world. Experts do disagree.

    Read More

  3. Public Health - Our Best & Brightest?

    May 31, 21 02:09 PM

    Public Health - our best & brightest? Are they saviours, or bunglers?

    Read More