The Law & Legal Remedies -
What Can Citizens Do?


  • First, be aware that all of the COVID-19 injections are STILL EXPERIMENTAL.  
  • They are being dispersed under a special allowance called "Emergency Use Authorization."  
  • They have not been approved by the FDA, except for the Comirnaty vaccine, said to be identical in all but name, to the Pfizer jab.  Incidentally, the Comirnaty shot is not available in the US, at least as of September 6. 2021.
  • All vaccine recipients are part of the ongoing safety trial.  That trial will not end until October 27, 2022 for the Moderna injection, and January 31, 2023 for the Pfizer shot.

Experimental vaccines may not be mandated.

Hear Executive Secretary of CDC'S ACIP (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) during the weekly meeting on August 2020, at 1:14:40 into this video:

"I just wanted to add that, just wanted to remind everybody, that under an Emergency Use Authorization, an EUA, vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory. So, early in this vaccination phase, individuals will have to be consented and they won't be able to be mandated."


(The link takes you to  Not just medicine, but LAW is a concern with them.)

"The law is clear. An experimental vaccine cannot be mandated. We want you to be armed with resources to advocate for yourself and your loved ones. 

Here are letter templates to utilize related to your employer or school attempting to mandate the Covid-19 experimental vaccine candidates. Please edit the portion in red, specific to you, and distribute. Send to principals, superintendents, department of education officials, managers, corporate officers, etc. Put everyone on notice!  Send on your own or unite with others’ signatures in support of your movement.

Informed and united people are truly the greatest threat to tyranny!"

links at AmericasFrontlineDoctors

Here's what that letter to a university looks like:

Download this and other forms at

See Catherine Austin Fitts' approach for getting employers and schools to back down:

(Excerpt from Jon Rappaport's blog No More Fake News}:

"Half of modern society runs on preparing for potential liability claims from the other half.

"The thing is, despite their standard liability policies, corporate and government employers aren’t ready for a blizzard of well-formed and pointed queries that put them on the spot, regarding their VACCINATION RESPONSIBILITY. These queries shake them up. It’s a bit like investigators getting a very shady hedge fund owner to open up his books to scrutiny.

"So…a corporate supervisor sits down with an employee who’s just been told he must get the COVID vaccine. The employee says, “I’m not saying no. I just want to know the conditions.”

“What conditions?”

“Nothing unusual. Who is responsible, in case I happen to suffer an injury.”

“An injury from what?”

“The vaccine.”


“I want to know who has legal and financial responsibility in that case. This corporation, government entities, my health and life insurance, workman’s comp, disability insurance, the person administering the injection…”

“That’s a lot of people.”

“Just covering my bases. My brother-in-law is an attorney. He’s requesting some of this information from the FDA.”

“An attorney? He’s going all the way to the FDA?”

“This is just routine. When something is mandated, a responsible person wants to understand the consequences of following the mandate.”

“You’re the first employee who’s raised all these issues.”

“I’m sure the company lawyers can help out here. Everybody has liability policies these days.”

“Uh…let me get back to you on this.”

“Sure. Of course.”

This is round one. The opening gambit.

The second conversation might start like this:

“Well, the word from our attorneys is, the federal government has issued blanket immunity from liability, in case of COVID vaccine injury.”

“Yes, I know. My attorney is querying that with the FDA.”

“He is?”

“For example, what about medical personnel who don’t follow correct procedures? The vial of vaccine wasn’t stored at a low enough temperature? But with you and the company, I’m interested in knowing what responsibility you would take. I’m on a company health insurance plan. What is the payout, and under what conditions, if I’m injured? I’ll need that information in writing…I’ve been reading my insurance policy. You see here, on page 14, where there’s a mention of a doctor’s confirming report? Would this be my doctor, the company’s, the insurance carrier’s? I asked my physician about this, and he wasn’t sure…”

Bit by bit, piece by piece, the employee gathers information.  If he’s going to mount a challenge to the mandated vaccination, he wants to know where he stands, in detail. And he wants to let his employer know, in every way possible, that he’s serious and competent. And he wants to get his employer to go on the record with as many assurances and confirmations as possible, relating to the employer’s financial and legal responsibilities.

When you think it through, it turns out that what the employee is asking for is quite reasonable.

I’m picturing this approach where parents are up against fascist school boards as well.

In addition to raising hell about COVID restrictions at school board meetings, several parents could be making dozens of recorded requests for information:

“What happens if my doctor certifies that my child has incurred an infection from wearing a mask all day in class? Are you prepared to take financial and legal responsibility in that situation? I want to see your policy on this in writing…”

“I want assurances that the other children are wearing masks that actually block the virus. I can provide documentation confirming that many types of masks are incompetent in this regard—including a statement from Dr. Fauci…”

At, Catherine and her team have put together highly useful, penetrating, and original documents that people can use, in a variety of situations where vaccinations are mandated.

The ceaseless propaganda about the need for vaccination produces a trance-effect in the public. Many actions are necessary, in order to break the spell.

Active intelligent people working their way into the Policy Beast of the Establishment create dissonant chords.

As a matter of course, officials and corporate employers sit smugly on their little thrones, believing they have the situation well in hand.

But when they’re put to the test, they often come up short.

The devil is in the details. When free and independent people drill down deeper and deeper, demanding those details, throne rooms shudder.

Question: “If I follow this approach, is there any guarantee I can avoid receiving the vaccine?”

Answer: There are no guarantees, except rock-bottom refusal to take the shot, no matter what. With the above approach, you may discover the mandating entity backs off, makes unexpected exceptions to the rule, inadvertently confesses to committing violations. All sorts of things can happen on a relentless fact-finding mission.  Read the full article at


From a white paper at called "Civil Liberties & Human Rights Issues Surrounding the COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates" (download the pdf)

"For many decades it has been illegal and unethical to mandate or coerce any medical treatment. Virtually all countries, NGOs, organizations, policy leaders, and physicians adhere to this principle, including the USA, the European Union, United Nations and the World Health Organization.

"Quite simply, by international law, no person can ever be coerced to take an experimental treatment.

"Unfortunately, AFLDS (America's Frontline Doctors) is aware of many people who have already been fired for refusing to take what is currently an experimental medication. This paper addresses this issue. 

The Experimental COVID-19 Vaccines

The Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson products are not approved by the FDA. Because they are only months old, with extremely limited safety and efficacy testing, the FDA has properly classified them as experimental. The soonest the Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech experimental vaccines could be considered by FDA for full licensure (in adults only) is when the trials are expected to conclude, on October 27, 2022 and January 31, 2023 , respectively. 

Emergency Use Authorization vs. FDA Approval

An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is a mechanism to facilitate the availability and use of medical countermeasures, including vaccines, during public health emergencies, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.  [Could this be the reason that early treatment therapies have been forbidden by the CDC standard of care?]

Current use of any of these four agents is authorized under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). Being approved under an Emergency Use Authorization means “the products are investigational and experimental” only, their investigational studies have not been completed, and they are only permitted to be approved because there is no FDA approved alternative... [such as early treatment options].

That does not mean there are no effective treatments... (see Stay Healthy).  It just means that the government has chosen to sideline every kind of treatment in favor of the vaccines, which could not receive the EUA if there were other alternatives available.

Why?  You can reach your own conclusions.


What legal remedies do we have against medical tyranny, and the governors, mayors, and city councils making use of this excellent new tool of repression?

Surprisingly, it turns out that many of those office-holders we voted into positions of authority didn't actually care much about us and our families and businesses.  But what can be done? 

Ohio stakeholders are doing it differently.

Apparently there have been THOUSANDS of COVID-related lawsuits that have gone nowhere.  These lawsuits were destined to fail because, although they were correct in claiming that constitutional rights of all kinds were being violated, all a governor had to do was say, "Yes, but this is an EMERGENCY."  And almost every judge everywhere would concur.

In Ohio, one large and growing group is going after the "emergency" claim itself.  If the governor or state cannot PROVE there is an emergency, then this has been FRAUD.

On the website "", you can follow their progress.

Make Americans Free Again legal page photo

The Ohio group is generously sharing their supporting documents - a 627-page complaint - with all comers.  They are serious about helping other states, as well.

On the page "Recent Recordings," you can scroll down and find the latest Conference call.  News and strategies are discussed.

Alaskans need to get on board - and some are.

Up in Soldotna, Homer, Anchorage, and Fairbanks, several different groups are meeting with one purpose in mind: to grow the numbers of informed Alaskans willing to talk to others and work together to protect our battered Constitution.  These Alaskan groups are meeting weekly and bi-weekly to plan community events and RAISE MONEY for the lawyer (already at work) who is framing the lawsuit(s) to protect Alaskans' rights.

They are following the Ohio model above, and are working together with MakeAmericansFreeAgain.

"Alaskans For Constitutional Rights" is the name of the Alaskan group, and you can contact them to learn more or donate to the legal fund.  We need self-help groups in every community in Alaska!

Consider joining their group, following their strategies, starting your own meetings locally.  If we sit and wait for others to take care of us, then we'll be like the poor Russians in Dostoevsky's "Gulag Archipelago," who cowered in fear when they heard the bootsteps of the secret police in their hallways at night.

Legality of Masks - They, Too, are Emergency Use Authorization

DANIEL HOROWITZ   March 26, 2021   The Blaze

"Just like the COVID vaccines, use of masks (instead of respirators) to block transmission of a virus was only authorized as experimental use. As such, according to law, it must be optional. 

"...  both the FDA and OSHA have made it clear over the years that only respirators, not masks, are considered valid PPE to block transmission of a respiratory virus. Which is why mask manufacturers must continue to place a disclaimer on their labels that the product DOES NOT WORK FOR AIRBORNE VIRUSES...

"Federal law governing the conditions of authorization of unapproved emergency medical products (21 U.S.C. §360bbb–3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III)) requires the secretary of HHS to "ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed," among other things, "of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product."

"The same statute requires that the secretary make it known to people that indeed the authorization was issued under emergency use and to inform the people "of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of the emergency use of the product, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown."

"The government is violating this every day by refusing to even study the unknown effects on workers and children of wearing these things for hours and days on end...."

Read the full article at The Blaze

Recent Articles

  1. The Law & Legal Remedies - What Can Citizens Do?

    Sep 07, 21 01:46 AM

    The word "EMERGENCY" seems to have rendered our law-makers impotent. What legal remedies do we have against medical tyranny?

    Read More

  2. PCR Tests - Why This Test Cannot Measure Real Infection

    Sep 06, 21 03:03 PM

    We now know that PCR tests cannot distinguish between “live” viruses & inactive (noninfectious) viral particles & therefore cannot be used as a diagnostic tool.

    Read More

  3. Vaccines - "Safe & Effective" is a Soundbite

    Sep 02, 21 02:13 AM

    Vaccines - "Safe & Effective" is a SOUNDBITE, not a scientific observation.

    Read More