The Law & Legal Remedies -
What Can Citizens Do?

REGARDING VACCINE MANDATES

  • First, be aware that all of the COVID-19 injections are STILL EXPERIMENTAL.  


  • They are being dispersed under a special allowance called "Emergency Use Authorization."  

  • They have not been approved by the FDA.

  • All vaccine recipients are part of the ongoing safety trial.  That trial will not end until October 27, 2022 for the Moderna injection, and January 31, 2023 for the Pfizer shot.

Experimental vaccines may not be mandated.

Hear Executive Secretary of CDC'S ACIP (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) during the weekly meeting on August 2020, at 1:14:40 into this video:


"I just wanted to add that, just wanted to remind everybody, that under an Emergency Use Authorization, an EUA, vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory. So, early in this vaccination phase, individuals will have to be consented and they won't be able to be mandated."


From a white paper at AmericasFrontlineDoctors.com called "Civil Liberties & Human Rights Issues Surrounding the COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates" (download the pdf)

"For many decades it has been illegal and unethical to mandate or coerce any medical treatment. Virtually all countries, NGOs, organizations, policy leaders, and physicians adhere to this principle, including the USA, the European Union, United Nations and the World Health Organization.

"Quite simply, by international law, no person can ever be coerced to take an experimental treatment.

"Unfortunately, AFLDS (America's Frontline Doctors) is aware of many people who have already been fired for refusing to take what is currently an experimental medication. This paper addresses this issue. 

The Experimental COVID-19 Vaccines

The Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson products are not approved by the FDA. Because they are only months old, with extremely limited safety and efficacy testing, the FDA has properly classified them as experimental. The soonest the Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech experimental vaccines could be considered by FDA for full licensure (in adults only) is when the trials are expected to conclude, on October 27, 2022 and January 31, 2023 , respectively. 

Emergency Use Authorization vs. FDA Approval

An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is a mechanism to facilitate the availability and use of medical countermeasures, including vaccines, during public health emergencies, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.  [Could this be the reason that early treatment therapies have been forbidden by the CDC standard of care?]

Current use of any of these four agents is authorized under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). Being approved under an Emergency Use Authorization means “the products are investigational and experimental” only, their investigational studies have not been completed, and they are only permitted to be approved because there is no FDA approved alternative... [such as early treatment options].

That does not mean there are no effective treatments... (see Stay Healthy).  It just means that the government has chosen to sideline every kind of treatment in favor of the vaccines, which could not receive the EUA if there were other alternatives available.

Why?  You can reach your own conclusions.




THE WORD "EMERGENCY" HAS RENDERED OUR LEGISLATORS IMPOTENT

What legal remedies do we have against medical tyranny, and the governors, mayors, and city councils making use of this excellent new tool of repression?

Surprisingly, it turns out that many of those office-holders we voted into positions of authority didn't actually care much about us and our families and businesses.  But what can be done? 

Ohio stakeholders are doing it differently.

Apparently there have been THOUSANDS of COVID-related lawsuits that have gone nowhere.  These lawsuits were destined to fail because, although they were correct in claiming that constitutional rights of all kinds were being violated, all a governor had to do was say, "Yes, but this is an EMERGENCY."  And almost every judge everywhere would concur.

In Ohio, one large and growing group is going after the "emergency" claim itself.  If the governor or state cannot PROVE there is an emergency, then this has been FRAUD.

On the website "MakeAmericansFreeAgain.com", you can follow their progress.

Make Americans Free Again legal page photo

The Ohio group is generously sharing their supporting documents - a 627-page complaint - with all comers.  They are serious about helping other states, as well.

On the page "Recent Recordings," you can scroll down and find the latest Conference call.  News and strategies are discussed.

Alaskans need to get on board - and some are.

Up in Soldotna, Homer, Anchorage, and Fairbanks, several different groups are meeting with one purpose in mind: to grow the numbers of informed Alaskans willing to talk to others and work together to protect our battered Constitution.  These Alaskan groups are meeting weekly and bi-weekly to plan community events and RAISE MONEY for the lawyer (already at work) who is framing the lawsuit(s) to protect Alaskans' rights.

They are following the Ohio model above, and are working together with MakeAmericansFreeAgain.

"Alaskans For Constitutional Rights" is the name of the Alaskan group, and you can contact them to learn more or donate to the legal fund.  We need self-help groups in every community in Alaska!

Consider joining their group, following their strategies, starting your own meetings locally.  If we sit and wait for others to take care of us, then we'll be like the poor Russians in Dostoevsky's "Gulag Archipelago," who cowered in fear when they heard the bootsteps of the secret police in their hallways at night.



Legality of Masks - They, Too, are Emergency Use Authorization

DANIEL HOROWITZ   March 26, 2021   The Blaze

"Just like the COVID vaccines, use of masks (instead of respirators) to block transmission of a virus was only authorized as experimental use. As such, according to law, it must be optional. 

"...  both the FDA and OSHA have made it clear over the years that only respirators, not masks, are considered valid PPE to block transmission of a respiratory virus. Which is why mask manufacturers must continue to place a disclaimer on their labels that the product DOES NOT WORK FOR AIRBORNE VIRUSES...

"Federal law governing the conditions of authorization of unapproved emergency medical products (21 U.S.C. §360bbb–3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III)) requires the secretary of HHS to "ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed," among other things, "of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product."

"The same statute requires that the secretary make it known to people that indeed the authorization was issued under emergency use and to inform the people "of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of the emergency use of the product, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown."

"The government is violating this every day by refusing to even study the unknown effects on workers and children of wearing these things for hours and days on end...."

Read the full article at The Blaze

Recent Articles

  1. Vaccine Injury - What is it and How Do You Report It?

    Jun 08, 21 03:23 AM

    Vaccine injury - many doctors think it doesn't happen. They now consider seizures almost a rite of passage - but years ago they were rare, not common.

    Read More

  2. COVID-19 Perspectives from Around the World

    Jun 07, 21 11:10 PM

    COVID-19 perspectives from countries around the world. Experts do disagree.

    Read More

  3. Public Health - Our Best & Brightest?

    May 31, 21 02:09 PM

    Public Health - our best & brightest? Are they saviours, or bunglers?

    Read More