Hear Executive Secretary of CDC'S ACIP (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) during the weekly meeting on August 2020, at 1:14:40 into this video:
(The link takes you to AmericasFrontlineDoctors.com. Not just medicine, but LAW is a concern with them.)
"The law is clear. An experimental vaccine cannot be mandated. We want you to be armed with resources to advocate for yourself and your loved ones.
Here are letter templates to utilize related to your employer or school attempting to mandate the Covid-19 experimental vaccine candidates. Please edit the portion in red, specific to you, and distribute. Send to principals, superintendents, department of education officials, managers, corporate officers, etc. Put everyone on notice! Send on your own or unite with others’ signatures in support of your movement.
Informed and united people are truly the greatest threat to tyranny!"
From a white paper at AmericasFrontlineDoctors.com called "Civil Liberties & Human Rights Issues Surrounding the COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates" (download the pdf)
"For many decades it has been illegal and unethical to mandate or coerce any medical treatment. Virtually all countries, NGOs, organizations, policy leaders, and physicians adhere to this principle, including the USA, the European Union, United Nations and the World Health Organization.
"Quite simply, by international law, no person can ever be coerced to take an experimental treatment.
"Unfortunately, AFLDS (America's Frontline Doctors) is aware of many people who have already been fired for refusing to take what is currently an experimental medication. This paper addresses this issue.
The Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson products are not approved by the FDA. Because they are only months old, with extremely limited safety and efficacy testing, the FDA has properly classified them as experimental. The soonest the Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech experimental vaccines could be considered by FDA for full licensure (in adults only) is when the trials are expected to conclude, on October 27, 2022 and January 31, 2023 , respectively.
An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is a mechanism to facilitate the availability and use of medical countermeasures, including vaccines, during public health emergencies, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic.
Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. [Could this be the reason that early treatment therapies have been forbidden by the CDC standard of care?]
Current use of any of these four agents is authorized under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). Being approved under an Emergency Use Authorization means “the products are investigational and experimental” only, their investigational studies have not been completed, and they are only permitted to be approved because there is no FDA approved alternative... [such as early treatment options].
That does not mean there are no effective treatments... (see Stay Healthy). It just means that the government has chosen to sideline every kind of treatment in favor of the vaccines, which could not receive the EUA if there were other alternatives available.
Why? You can reach your own conclusions.
What legal remedies do we have against medical tyranny, and the governors, mayors, and city councils making use of this excellent new tool of repression?
Surprisingly, it turns out that many of those office-holders we voted into positions of authority didn't actually care much about us and our families and businesses. But what can be done?
Apparently there have been THOUSANDS of COVID-related lawsuits that have gone nowhere. These lawsuits were destined to fail because, although they were correct in claiming that constitutional rights of all kinds were being violated, all a governor had to do was say, "Yes, but this is an EMERGENCY." And almost every judge everywhere would concur.
In Ohio, one large and growing group is going after the "emergency" claim itself. If the governor or state cannot PROVE there is an emergency, then this has been FRAUD.
On the website "MakeAmericansFreeAgain.com", you can follow their progress.
The Ohio group is generously sharing their supporting documents - a 627-page complaint - with all comers. They are serious about helping other states, as well.
On the page "Recent Recordings," you can scroll down and find the latest Conference call. News and strategies are discussed.
Up in Soldotna, Homer, Anchorage, and Fairbanks, several different groups are meeting with one purpose in mind: to grow the numbers of informed Alaskans willing to talk to others and work together to protect our battered Constitution. These Alaskan groups are meeting weekly and bi-weekly to plan community events and RAISE MONEY for the lawyer (already at work) who is framing the lawsuit(s) to protect Alaskans' rights.
They are following the Ohio model above, and are working together with MakeAmericansFreeAgain.
Consider joining their group, following their strategies, starting your own meetings locally. If we sit and wait for others to take care of us, then we'll be like the poor Russians in Dostoevsky's "Gulag Archipelago," who cowered in fear when they heard the bootsteps of the secret police in their hallways at night.
DANIEL HOROWITZ March 26, 2021 The Blaze
"Just like the COVID vaccines, use of masks (instead of respirators) to block transmission of a virus was only authorized as experimental use. As such, according to law, it must be optional.
"... both the FDA and OSHA have made it clear over the years that only respirators, not masks, are considered valid PPE to block transmission of a respiratory virus. Which is why mask manufacturers must continue to place a disclaimer on their labels that the product DOES NOT WORK FOR AIRBORNE VIRUSES...
"Federal law governing the conditions of authorization of unapproved emergency medical products (21 U.S.C. §360bbb–3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III)) requires the secretary of HHS to "ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed," among other things, "of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product."
"The same statute requires that the secretary make it known to people that indeed the authorization was issued under emergency use and to inform the people "of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of the emergency use of the product, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown."
"The government is violating this every day by refusing to even study the unknown effects on workers and children of wearing these things for hours and days on end...."
Jul 12, 21 11:40 AM
Vaccine injury - many doctors think it doesn't happen. They now consider seizures almost a rite of passage - but years ago they were rare, not common.
Jun 18, 21 02:21 PM
The word "EMERGENCY" seems to have rendered our law-makers impotent. What legal remedies do we have against medical tyranny?
Jun 07, 21 11:10 PM
COVID-19 perspectives from countries around the world. Experts do disagree.